![]() I suspect that this is metaphorical, but can you explain your precise interpretation of these parts? He starts talking about god a lot in the concluding parts of the book. Do you agree that Tarkovsky fails to assess this film in this way? I also notice this film to be more theatrical in approach when watching. Broadly, he explicates that this film is more of a parable, suggesting even that he made certain decisions in order to proffer a message, something that he vehemently warns against earlier. My impression is that the way Tarkovsky writes about The Sacrifice is contrary to his previous descriptions of ideal art. ![]() ![]() My experience is quite the opposite, colour (even in a desaturated form like in Stalker) is always apparent to me in my memories and such. If I am understanding correctly, Tarkovsky essentially suggests that colour is inconspicuous so he avoids it. I read Tarkovsky's "Sculpting in Time" a few months ago and I found it extremely important, but I have a few points of confusion/disagreement that I would like resolved. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |